design: be such problem for manufacturers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such problem for manufacturers 1.00
be hard for companies 0.79
helpful for companies 0.78
be made without manufacturing machines 0.77
be important in manufacturing 0.77
be used in industrial manufacture 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(design, be such problem for manufacturers)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(design, helpful for companies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be hard for companies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important in manufacturing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(design, helpful for companies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(design, be hard for companies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important in manufacturing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(design, be hard for companies)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(design, helpful for companies)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(design, be important in manufacturing)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(design, be hard for companies)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, helpful for companies)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in manufacturing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(design, be such problem for manufacturers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(prototype, be made without manufacturing machines)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, be such problem for manufacturers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prototype, be used in industrial manufacture)