design: is career

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is career 1.00
is good career 0.97
is career choice 0.91
is good career choice 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, is career)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(design, is good career)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(design, is good career)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(design, is career choice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, is good career choice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(design, is career choice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, is good career choice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(design, is career choice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career choice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is career)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(design, is career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)