design: is good career

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good career 1.00
is career 0.97
is good career choice 0.93
is career choice 0.90
is good job 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, is good job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(architect, is good job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(architect, is good job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(design, is good career)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, is career)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(design, is good career choice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is career)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(design, is career)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(design, is career choice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(design, is good career choice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, is good career choice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(design, is career choice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(design, is career choice)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is career)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(design, is career choice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career choice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, is good career)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(design, is good career) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(architect, is good job)