design: relate to fashion design

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cost
Weight: 0.64
, industry
Weight: 0.63
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, layout
Weight: 0.62
Siblings architect
Weight: 0.71
, design pattern
Weight: 0.69
, prototype
Weight: 0.63
, chevron
Weight: 0.62
, logo
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to fashion design 1.00
affect fashion 0.89
be used in fashion 0.88
hate interior designers 0.81
use design process 0.80
hate designers 0.79
design house prevent 0.77
be consideration in design 0.76
actually matters in sportswear 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(architect, hate interior designers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(architect, design house prevent)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(architect, hate interior designers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(architect, hate interior designers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(architect, design house prevent) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(architect, design house prevent)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(design, relate to fashion design)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(design, be used in fashion)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(design, affect fashion)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(design, affect fashion)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(design, be used in fashion)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(design, use design process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(design, be used in fashion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(design, use design process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(design, actually matters in sportswear)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(design, affect fashion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(design, be used in fashion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(design, use design process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(design, use design process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(design, actually matters in sportswear)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(design, affect fashion)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(design, actually matters in sportswear)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(design, actually matters in sportswear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(design, relate to fashion design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(architect, hate interior designers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(design, relate to fashion design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(architect, design house prevent)