dessert: be served at end

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served at end 1.00
be served 0.93
is served last 0.92
is served 0.92
be served at end of meal 0.91
be typically served 0.86
be served with cheese 0.83
be served with pickle 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit salad, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be served)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be typically served)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, be served)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, be served with cheese)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(fruit salad, be served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(fruit salad, be typically served) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(sandwich, be served with pickle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(apple pie, be served with cheese) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(apple pie, be served with cheese)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(dessert, be served at end)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dessert, is served)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served last)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(dessert, is served)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(dessert, is served last)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(dessert, is served last)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end of meal)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is served)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dessert, is served last)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(dessert, be served at end)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be served)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be typically served)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(apple pie, be served with cheese)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be served)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(sandwich, be served with pickle)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(dessert, be served at end) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(fruit salad, be typically served)