det: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents role
Weight: 0.45
, duty
Weight: 0.45
, time
Weight: 0.41
, place
Weight: 0.40
, team
Weight: 0.39
Siblings tiny tim
Weight: 0.29
, eden
Weight: 0.29
, september
Weight: 0.29
, venice
Weight: 0.29
, springfield
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
news 0.92
has quality bad 0.80
is press sports 0.76
is free press sports 0.76
is lions news 0.76
has quality better 0.76
has state press 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(det, has quality news)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(role, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(det, has quality news)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(role, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(team, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(role, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(team, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(september, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(role, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(det, has quality news)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(team, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(det, has quality news)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(september, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(september, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(det, has quality news)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(det, news)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(det, news)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(det, news)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(det, news)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(det, is lions news)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(det, is lions news)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(det, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(det, is lions news)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(det, is press sports)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(det, is lions news)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(det, is free press sports)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(det, has state press)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(det, is free press sports)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(det, is press sports)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(det, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(det, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(det, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(det, has state press)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(det, has state press)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(det, has state press)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(det, is press sports)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(det, is press sports)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(det, is free press sports)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(det, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(det, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(det, is free press sports)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(det, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(team, has quality better)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(september, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(role, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(det, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(team, has quality better)