detector: be used more

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, apparatus
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.49
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, antenna
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used more 1.00
be used 0.89
is used for 0.87
be are used 0.81
be more difficult than products 0.79
were used in past 0.78
cost more 0.78
be much better than others 0.78
cost less 0.78
be more difficult than traditional products 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(detector, be used more)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(detector, be used more)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(product, cost more)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, cost more)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(product, be more difficult than traditional products)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(diode, be used)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(antenna, is used for)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(detector, be used more)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(product, be more difficult than traditional products) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(detector, be used more)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be used)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(diode, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(diode, be used)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(antenna, is used for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(antenna, is used for)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(detector, be used more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(detector, be used more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(antenna, is used for)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(diode, be used)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(product, be more difficult than traditional products)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(detector, be used more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)