digital camera: be used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used 1.00
be are used 0.84
were used in past 0.77
be are used in office 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(photograph, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(photograph, be used)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(photograph, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be used)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(digital camera, be used)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(digital camera, were used in past)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(digital camera, be are used)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(photograph, be used)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(photograph, be used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(digital camera, be used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)