camera: were used in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used in past 1.00
be are used 0.81
were then 0.81
were used in ways 0.80
have dashcams 0.79
were made 0.79
is used for 0.79
been are improved 0.79
were back then 0.78
be are used in office 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(digital camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(digital camera, be are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(digital camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(digital camera, be are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(camera, were used in past)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(camera, been are improved)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camera, were made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(camera, been are improved)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(camera, were back then)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camera, were made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(camera, were back then)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(camera, were back then)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(camera, were back then)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)