camera: been are improved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents digital camera
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, recorder
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.61
Siblings camera lens
Weight: 0.70
, human eye
Weight: 0.60
, underwater
Weight: 0.54
, cctv
Weight: 0.54
, flip
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
been are improved 1.00
be are used 0.81
were used in past 0.79
have dashcams 0.77
has quality better 0.76
were made 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(digital camera, be are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(digital camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(cctv, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(camera, been are improved)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(digital camera, be are used) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(camera, been are improved)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(digital camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(camera, been are improved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(cctv, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cctv, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(camera, been are improved)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(camera, were made)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(camera, were made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(camera, were made)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(camera, were made)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(camera, were used in past)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cctv, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)