digital camera: been are improved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
been are improved 1.00
be are used 0.81
were used in past 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(camera, been are improved)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(camera, been are improved)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, been are improved)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(digital camera, been are improved)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(digital camera, were used in past)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(digital camera, be are used)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(digital camera, been are improved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(camera, been are improved)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(digital camera, been are improved) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)