digital camera: be are used in office

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.76
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.73
, photograph
Weight: 0.73
, camera
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mobile phone
Weight: 0.73
, computer
Weight: 0.71
, floppy disk
Weight: 0.64
, scanner
Weight: 0.63
, video
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be are used in office 1.00
be are used in medical office 0.92
be are used 0.86
were used in past 0.78
be used 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(camera, be are used in medical office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(photograph, be used)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(photograph, be used)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(camera, were used in past)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(camera, were used in past)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(camera, be are used in medical office)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(camera, were used in past)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(photograph, be used)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in medical office)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be are used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digital camera, be used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(digital camera, were used in past)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, were used in past)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(digital camera, were used in past)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(digital camera, be used)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(digital camera, be are used)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(digital camera, were used in past)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(digital camera, be used)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(photograph, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(photograph, be used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(camera, be are used in medical office)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(digital camera, be are used in office)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(camera, were used in past)