detector: be vs carbon monoxide detector

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, apparatus
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.49
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, antenna
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs carbon monoxide detector 1.00
be vs smoke detector 0.91
is vs photoelectric 0.79
be set at 0000 absorbance 0.79
emit light 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be set at 0000 absorbance)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(diode, emit light)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(diode, emit light)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(diode, emit light)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(spectrophotometer, be set at 0000 absorbance)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(spectrophotometer, be set at 0000 absorbance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detector, be vs smoke detector)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(diode, emit light)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(spectrophotometer, be set at 0000 absorbance)