detector: be vs smoke detector

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, apparatus
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.59
, device
Weight: 0.59
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spectrophotometer
Weight: 0.49
, network device
Weight: 0.35
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, digital camera
Weight: 0.35
, antenna
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs smoke detector 1.00
be vs carbon monoxide detector 0.91
detect smoke 0.84
even detect smoke 0.83
is vs photoelectric 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(smoke detector, even detect smoke)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(smoke detector, detect smoke)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, detect smoke)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, even detect smoke)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, detect smoke)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, even detect smoke)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(smoke detector, even detect smoke)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(smoke detector, detect smoke)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detector, be vs smoke detector)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(detector, is vs photoelectric)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(detector, be vs carbon monoxide detector)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(smoke detector, detect smoke)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(smoke detector, even detect smoke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(smoke detector, detect smoke)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(detector, be vs smoke detector)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(smoke detector, even detect smoke)