detergent: be harmful to water animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful to water animals 1.00
be harmful to animals 0.97
be harmful to water 0.93
be harmful to environment 0.85
be harmful for environment 0.85
cause water pollution 0.80
affect aquatic life like fish 0.80
have effects in different types of water 0.78
have effect on water 0.77
work in water 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bleach, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bleach, be harmful to environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bleach, be harmful to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(detergent, have effect on water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(detergent, work in water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(detergent, affect aquatic life like fish)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(detergent, cause water pollution)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(detergent, cause water pollution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(detergent, affect aquatic life like fish)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(detergent, have effect on water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(detergent, affect aquatic life like fish)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detergent, cause water pollution)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(detergent, cause water pollution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detergent, work in water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(detergent, have effects in different types of water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(detergent, affect aquatic life like fish)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(detergent, have effect on water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(detergent, have effects in different types of water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(detergent, work in water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, have effects in different types of water)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(detergent, have effects in different types of water)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work in water)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(detergent, have effect on water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bleach, be harmful to environment)