detergent: be harmful for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful for environment 1.00
be harmful to environment 0.99
be bad for environment 0.89
be harmful to water 0.88
be harmful to animals 0.86
be harmful to water animals 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(bleach, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bleach, be harmful to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bleach, be harmful to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bleach, be harmful to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(bleach, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(bleach, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful to water animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(detergent, be harmful for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(bleach, be harmful to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bleach, be bad for environment)