shampoo: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.77
be good for everyday life 0.76
be bad for skin 0.75
be important for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(product, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(product, be important for business)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(gel, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gel, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(product, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for skin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(product, be important for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for skin)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(shampoo, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for skin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)