shampoo: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
be bad for environment 0.80
has quality availability 0.77
be horrible to taste 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(gel, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(soap, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gel, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality better)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality better)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(shampoo, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)