shampoo: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
has quality availability 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77
is best 0.76
be good for everyday life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(gel, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(soap, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(gel, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(gel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(detergent, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(hair gel, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(mouthwash, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(deodorant, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(deodorant, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(shampoo, has quality better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality better)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(shampoo, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(shampoo, is best)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shampoo, is best)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(shampoo, is best)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(hair gel, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(deodorant, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(mouthwash, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(gel, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shampoo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detergent, be bad for environment)