soap: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.69
, show
Weight: 0.62
, detergent
Weight: 0.61
, staple
Weight: 0.61
, craft
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.58
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.52
, neighbours
Weight: 0.44
, soap opera
Weight: 0.39
, sitcom
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
be better than others 0.81
help water clean better 0.77
be less effective in hard water 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(soap, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality better)