soap: be less effective in hard water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.69
, show
Weight: 0.62
, detergent
Weight: 0.61
, staple
Weight: 0.61
, craft
Weight: 0.58
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.58
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.52
, neighbours
Weight: 0.44
, soap opera
Weight: 0.39
, sitcom
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be less effective in hard water 1.00
be less effective in water 0.96
help water clean better 0.79
be better than others 0.76
be much more dense than sponge 0.76
help water 0.75
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shampoo, be better than others) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be better than others)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shampoo, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shampoo, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(soap, be less effective in water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(soap, be less effective in water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(soap, help water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(soap, be much more dense than sponge)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(soap, help water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(soap, help water)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(soap, be much more dense than sponge)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(soap, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(soap, be much more dense than sponge)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(soap, be much more dense than sponge)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(soap, help water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(soap, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(soap, has quality better)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(soap, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shampoo, be better than others)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shampoo, has quality better)