detergent: is better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better 1.00
work better than water 0.87
work better in water 0.85
work better than cold water 0.82
perform better in hard water 0.80
work better in hot water 0.80
perform better in water 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(detergent, is better)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(detergent, work better than water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, work better in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better than water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(detergent, work better than water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(detergent, work better than cold water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, work better in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(detergent, perform better in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(detergent, work better than cold water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(detergent, perform better in water)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(detergent, perform better in water)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better in water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better than water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(detergent, is better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(detergent, is better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(detergent, is better)