detergent: work better than cold water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.65
, liquid
Weight: 0.63
, disinfectant
Weight: 0.62
Siblings shampoo
Weight: 0.60
, sodium lauryl sulphate
Weight: 0.59
, bleach
Weight: 0.37
, liquid water
Weight: 0.36
, acetic acid
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
work better than cold water 1.00
work better than water 0.94
work better in water 0.94
work better in hot water 0.92
work in water 0.86
work in hard water 0.86
perform better in hard water 0.84
is better 0.82
perform better in water 0.81
be affected by hard water 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(detergent, work better than cold water)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(detergent, work better than water)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(detergent, work better in water)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(detergent, work in hard water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work in hard water)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(detergent, work in water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(detergent, work in water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(detergent, work better than water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(detergent, work in hard water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(detergent, work in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better than water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(detergent, work better in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, work better in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better in water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better than water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(detergent, perform better in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, work better in hot water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in hard water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(detergent, perform better in water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(detergent, work in hard water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(detergent, is better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(detergent, is better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(detergent, perform better in water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work in water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(detergent, perform better in water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(detergent, is better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(detergent, is better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(detergent, work better than cold water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(detergent, work better than cold water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(detergent, work better than cold water)