detroit: is bad city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents michigan
Weight: 0.65
, new york
Weight: 0.63
, democrat
Weight: 0.59
, team
Weight: 0.59
, name
Weight: 0.58
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, cleveland
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, boston
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad city 1.00
is city 0.91
is dangerous city 0.87
be considered city 0.84
is most dangerous city 0.84
be worst city in america 0.80
is abandoned city 0.78
be called rock city 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(michigan, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(detroit, is bad city)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(detroit, is bad city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(michigan, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(boston, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(michigan, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(detroit, is bad city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(detroit, is bad city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(philadelphia, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(boston, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(boston, is city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(cleveland, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(cleveland, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(cleveland, is bad city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(detroit, is bad city)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(detroit, is city)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(detroit, be called rock city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is abandoned city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(detroit, be called rock city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(detroit, is abandoned city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(detroit, is abandoned city)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(detroit, is city)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be called rock city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(detroit, be considered city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(detroit, be called rock city)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(detroit, is abandoned city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be worst city in america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(detroit, be considered city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(detroit, is most dangerous city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(detroit, is dangerous city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(detroit, is city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(detroit, be considered city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(detroit, be worst city in america)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(detroit, is most dangerous city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(detroit, is dangerous city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(detroit, be worst city in america)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(detroit, be worst city in america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is dangerous city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is most dangerous city)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(detroit, is most dangerous city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(detroit, be considered city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(detroit, is dangerous city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(detroit, is bad city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(michigan, is city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(boston, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cleveland, is city)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(cleveland, is bad city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(michigan, is city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(detroit, is bad city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)