development: be in genetics helping

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.63
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.60
Siblings acquisition
Weight: 0.69
, artificial intelligence
Weight: 0.64
, discovery
Weight: 0.62
, well
Weight: 0.60
, cell division
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in genetics helping 1.00
be in genetics 0.91
be important in biology 0.77
be related to cancer with p53 gene 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cell division, be related to cancer with p53 gene)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cell division, be related to cancer with p53 gene) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(cell division, be related to cancer with p53 gene)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(development, be in genetics helping)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(development, be important in biology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(development, be important in biology)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(development, be important in biology)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(development, be important in biology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(development, be in genetics helping)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(development, be in genetics helping)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(development, be in genetics helping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(cell division, be related to cancer with p53 gene)