device: improve audio

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
improve audio 1.00
is video 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, improve audio)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(smoke detector, is video)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(electronic device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(device, improve audio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(smoke detector, is video)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(smoke detector, is video)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(device, improve audio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(device, improve audio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(smoke detector, is video)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(device, improve audio)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(electronic device, improve audio)