dialect: be barrier to communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, sign language
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, difference
Weight: 0.53
Siblings english
Weight: 0.61
, cockney
Weight: 0.57
, mandarin
Weight: 0.56
, creole
Weight: 0.56
, cantonese
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be barrier to communication 1.00
be important in communication 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sign language, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dialect, be barrier to communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sign language, be important in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be important in communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sign language, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(dialect, be barrier to communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(dialect, be barrier to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialect, be important in communication)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dialect, be important in communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dialect, be important in communication)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be important in communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be barrier to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dialect, be barrier to communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sign language, be important in communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(dialect, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sign language, be important in communication)