dialect: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, sign language
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, difference
Weight: 0.53
Siblings english
Weight: 0.61
, cockney
Weight: 0.57
, mandarin
Weight: 0.56
, creole
Weight: 0.56
, cantonese
Weight: 0.55

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be barrier to communication 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sign language, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialect, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sign language, be important in communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be important in communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(sign language, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dialect, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(dialect, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(dialect, be barrier to communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(dialect, be barrier to communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(dialect, be barrier to communication)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be barrier to communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialect, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sign language, be important in communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialect, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sign language, be important in communication)