dialogue: be in story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.62
, work
Weight: 0.60
, exchange
Weight: 0.60
, conversation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings discussion
Weight: 0.66
, republic
Weight: 0.59
, parmenides
Weight: 0.48
, framework
Weight: 0.33
, partnership
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in story 1.00
be important in story 0.96
be used in story 0.96
be important in narrative 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(dialogue, be in story)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in story)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be used in story)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(dialogue, be used in story)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be important in narrative)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be used in story)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(dialogue, be used in story)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in story)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(dialogue, be important in narrative)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in story)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dialogue, be important in narrative)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in story)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(dialogue, be important in narrative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(dialogue, be in story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(dialogue, be in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(dialogue, be in story)