dialysis: be required after kidney failure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.70
, condition
Weight: 0.62
, renal failure
Weight: 0.60
, service
Weight: 0.58
, intervention
Weight: 0.55
Siblings hospital care
Weight: 0.37
, blood transfusion
Weight: 0.36
, transplant
Weight: 0.36
, chemotherapy
Weight: 0.36
, surgery
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be required after kidney failure 1.00
be better than kidney transplant 0.83
give relief to kidney patient 0.81
replace kidney function 0.81
affect kidneys 0.80
replace regular kidney function 0.80
fail because of rejection 0.78
is required 0.77
be given after surgery 0.76
be used after surgery 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(blood transfusion, is required)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, be given after surgery)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(chemotherapy, be used after surgery)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(blood transfusion, is required)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(blood transfusion, is required)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(chemotherapy, be given after surgery)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(chemotherapy, be given after surgery)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(chemotherapy, be used after surgery)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chemotherapy, be used after surgery)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(transplant, fail because of rejection)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(transplant, fail because of rejection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(dialysis, is required)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dialysis, be better than kidney transplant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(dialysis, give relief to kidney patient)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dialysis, affect kidneys)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(dialysis, give relief to kidney patient)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(dialysis, replace kidney function)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(dialysis, is required)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(dialysis, give relief to kidney patient)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(dialysis, be better than kidney transplant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialysis, replace regular kidney function)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(dialysis, be better than kidney transplant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, give relief to kidney patient)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(dialysis, affect kidneys)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dialysis, replace kidney function)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(dialysis, is required)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(dialysis, affect kidneys)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be better than kidney transplant)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(dialysis, replace regular kidney function)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(dialysis, replace kidney function)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(dialysis, replace regular kidney function)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, replace regular kidney function)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, replace kidney function)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, affect kidneys)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, is required)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(chemotherapy, be used after surgery)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(blood transfusion, is required)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(chemotherapy, be given after surgery)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(dialysis, be required after kidney failure)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transplant, fail because of rejection)