diamond: be at ring

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35
, tungsten
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ring 1.00
be used to wed ring 0.83
be at engagement ring 0.82
be used to april birthstone ring 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(diamond, be at ring)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(diamond, be at engagement ring)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(diamond, be used to april birthstone ring)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be at engagement ring)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(diamond, be at engagement ring)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be used to april birthstone ring)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(diamond, be used to april birthstone ring)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(diamond, be used to wed ring)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(diamond, be at engagement ring)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diamond, be used to april birthstone ring)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be at ring)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diamond, be at ring) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(diamond, be at ring)