diamond: be considered mineral

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, tourmaline
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered mineral 1.00
be mineral 0.97
is mineral 0.97
be considered minerals 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is mineral)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(quartz, is mineral)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(quartz, is mineral)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(quartz, is mineral)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(garnet, is mineral)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garnet, is mineral)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(diamond, be considered mineral)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be mineral)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, is mineral)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(diamond, is mineral)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(diamond, be mineral)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(diamond, be mineral)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diamond, is mineral)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(diamond, be mineral)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(diamond, is mineral)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered mineral)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(quartz, is mineral)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(garnet, is mineral)