diamond: be considered minerals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mineral
Weight: 0.70
, commodity
Weight: 0.63
, material
Weight: 0.62
, jewel
Weight: 0.62
Siblings infield
Weight: 0.41
, quartz
Weight: 0.36
, tourmaline
Weight: 0.36
, garnet
Weight: 0.35
, emerald
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered minerals 1.00
be considered mineral 0.90
be mineral 0.86
is mineral 0.86
be found in coal mines 0.78
is mined 0.75
be mined 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mineral, be mined)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(mineral, be mined)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(mineral, be mined)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(quartz, be mined)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(garnet, be mined)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(emerald, is mined)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(garnet, is mineral)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(quartz, is mineral)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(mineral, be mined)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(quartz, is mineral)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(quartz, is mineral)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(garnet, is mineral)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garnet, is mineral)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(emerald, is mined)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(emerald, is mined)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(garnet, be mined)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(garnet, be mined)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(quartz, be mined)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(quartz, be mined)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered mineral)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be mineral)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, is mineral)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered mineral)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(diamond, is mineral)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(diamond, be mineral)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be found in coal mines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(diamond, is mined)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(diamond, be found in coal mines)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(diamond, be found in coal mines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(diamond, be considered mineral)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(diamond, be considered mineral)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diamond, is mineral)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(diamond, be mineral)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(diamond, be mineral)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(diamond, is mineral)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(diamond, is mined)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(diamond, be found in coal mines)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(diamond, is mined)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(diamond, is mined)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mineral, be mined)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(quartz, is mineral)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(garnet, is mineral)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(emerald, is mined)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(garnet, be mined)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(quartz, be mined)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(diamond, be considered minerals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mineral, be mined)