diaphragm: has state eventration

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.64
, pump
Weight: 0.61
, tissue
Weight: 0.58
, method
Weight: 0.57
, respiratory system
Weight: 0.56
Siblings endotracheal tube
Weight: 0.35
, salivary gland
Weight: 0.35
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.35
, nasal cavity
Weight: 0.35
, fallopian tube
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state eventration 1.00
has state last 0.90
has state problem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diaphragm, has state eventration)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(device, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(device, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(vacuum tube, has state last)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(device, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(diaphragm, has state eventration)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(vacuum tube, has state last)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(vacuum tube, has state last)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(diaphragm, has state eventration)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, has state eventration)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(diaphragm, has state eventration)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(vacuum tube, has state last)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(diaphragm, has state eventration)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(device, has state problem)