diaphragm: is effective

Related concepts

Parents	device Weight: 0.64 , pump Weight: 0.61 , tissue Weight: 0.58 , method Weight: 0.57 , respiratory system Weight: 0.56
Siblings	endotracheal tube Weight: 0.35 , salivary gland Weight: 0.35 , vacuum tube Weight: 0.35 , nasal cavity Weight: 0.35 , fallopian tube Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is effective	1.00
is most effective	0.93
be effective preventing	0.83
be efficient 100	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(diaphragm, is effective)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(method, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(diaphragm, is effective)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(diaphragm, is effective)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(method, is effective)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(device, be efficient 100)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(method, is most effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(device, be efficient 100)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(method, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.37

Plausible(method, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(diaphragm, is effective)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(method, is most effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(diaphragm, is effective)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(device, be efficient 100) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(diaphragm, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(diaphragm, is effective)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, be effective preventing)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(diaphragm, be effective preventing)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(diaphragm, be effective preventing)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(diaphragm, be effective preventing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Salient(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Plausible(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(diaphragm, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(method, is effective)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(method, is most effective)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(method, is effective)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(method, is most effective)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(diaphragm, is effective) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(device, be efficient 100)