diesel: is cheaper

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.69
, fuel
Weight: 0.69
, fuel oil
Weight: 0.67
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.64
, natural gas
Weight: 0.62
Siblings biodiesel
Weight: 0.61
, petrol
Weight: 0.38
, gasoline
Weight: 0.38
, electric motor
Weight: 0.37
, motor oil
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is cheaper 1.00
be cheaper to tax 0.86
is more expensive 0.86
is expensive 0.85
get more expensive 0.84
be cheaper in ireland 0.81
be more expensive to service 0.80
cost more 0.78
be expensive in us 0.77
is more efficient 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diesel engine, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(diesel engine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(diesel engine, cost more)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diesel, is cheaper)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, cost more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(diesel engine, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, cost more)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(diesel engine, is more efficient)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(biodiesel, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(electric motor, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(motor oil, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(gasoline, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(petrol, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(diesel engine, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(diesel engine, cost more)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(diesel engine, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(petrol, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(petrol, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(gasoline, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(gasoline, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(motor oil, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(motor oil, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(electric motor, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(electric motor, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(biodiesel, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(biodiesel, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(diesel, is cheaper)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(diesel, be cheaper to tax)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(diesel, is more expensive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diesel, is expensive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(diesel, be more expensive to service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(diesel, be more expensive to service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(diesel, be cheaper to tax)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(diesel, be more expensive to service)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(diesel, be cheaper to tax)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diesel, be more expensive to service)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(diesel, is more expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(diesel, is more expensive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(diesel, be cheaper to tax)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(diesel, cost more)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(diesel, is more efficient)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(diesel, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diesel, cost more)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(diesel, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(diesel, cost more)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(diesel, is more efficient)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(diesel, is more efficient)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diesel, cost more)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is more efficient)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(diesel, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diesel engine, is more expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(diesel engine, cost more)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diesel engine, is more efficient)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(biodiesel, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(electric motor, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(petrol, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(gasoline, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(motor oil, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(diesel engine, is more expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(diesel engine, cost more)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(diesel, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(diesel engine, is more efficient)