diet: be important maintaining

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important maintaining 1.00
be maintained 0.78
be important in current environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet, be important maintaining)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(attitude, be maintained)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(diet, be important maintaining)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(attitude, be maintained) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(attitude, be maintained)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(diet, be important maintaining)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, be important maintaining)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet, be important maintaining)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(attitude, be maintained)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet, be important maintaining) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)