diet: fail psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail psychology 1.00
be to psychology 0.92
be important in psychology 0.91
be important in social psychology 0.88
fail hbr 0.80
fail 0.80
fail rivkin 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(strategy, fail hbr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(diet, fail psychology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(strategy, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(diet, fail psychology)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(strategy, fail rivkin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(diet, fail psychology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(strategy, fail rivkin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(strategy, fail)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(strategy, fail hbr)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fail rivkin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(strategy, fail hbr)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(approach, be to psychology)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(attitude, be important in psychology)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(attitude, be important in social psychology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(strategy, fail hbr) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, fail psychology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(strategy, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, fail psychology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(strategy, fail rivkin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, fail psychology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(approach, be to psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(approach, be to psychology)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(attitude, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(attitude, be important in psychology)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(attitude, be important in social psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(attitude, be important in social psychology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(diet, fail psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(diet, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(diet, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(diet, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(diet, fail psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(strategy, fail rivkin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(strategy, fail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(strategy, fail hbr)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(approach, be to psychology)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(attitude, be important in psychology)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(attitude, be important in social psychology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(strategy, fail rivkin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(strategy, fail)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(diet, fail psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(strategy, fail hbr)