diet: have coke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have coke 1.00
is coke 0.99
have different coke 0.97
be bad coke 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diet, have coke)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(diet, is coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(diet, is coke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad coke)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diet, be bad coke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(diet, is coke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(diet, have different coke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(diet, be bad coke)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(diet, is coke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diet, be bad coke)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, have different coke)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(diet, have different coke)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(diet, have different coke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet, have coke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(diet, have coke)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet, have coke)