diet: have different coke

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents strategy
Weight: 0.63
, diabetes
Weight: 0.58
, trait
Weight: 0.58
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.57
Siblings taste
Weight: 0.32
, approach
Weight: 0.31
, attitude
Weight: 0.31
, consumption
Weight: 0.31
, flavor
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have different coke 1.00
have coke 0.97
is coke 0.96
be bad coke 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(diet, have different coke)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(diet, have coke)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(diet, is coke)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(diet, be bad coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(diet, be bad coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(diet, is coke)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(diet, be bad coke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diet, have coke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(diet, have coke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(diet, is coke)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(diet, is coke)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(diet, be bad coke)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet, have coke)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(diet, have different coke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(diet, have different coke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(diet, have different coke)