difference: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, need
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.60
, consideration
Weight: 0.59
Siblings different people
Weight: 0.58
, range
Weight: 0.58
, add
Weight: 0.57
, implication
Weight: 0.55
, magnitude
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
CAN good 0.81
actually can improve business 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(range, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(range, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(range, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(range, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(range, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(magnitude, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(magnitude, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(range, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(range, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(range, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(range, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(difference, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(difference, actually can improve business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(difference, actually can improve business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(difference, actually can improve business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(difference, actually can improve business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(difference, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(range, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(range, has quality better)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(magnitude, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(difference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(range, has quality bad)