digestion: be different compared to more complex animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents process
Weight: 0.67
, function
Weight: 0.64
, autonomic nervous system
Weight: 0.60
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings metabolism
Weight: 0.36
, fermentation
Weight: 0.36
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.35
, hydrolysis
Weight: 0.35
, cellular respiration
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different compared to more complex animals 1.00
is more complex 0.86
be important for animals 0.81
be different from human 0.79
differ in single animals 0.79
be more complex than carbohydrates 0.78
be necessary for animals 0.78
be necessary process for animals 0.76
be unsuitable for animals 0.76
be different in small 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for animals)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, be important for animals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(photosynthesis, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, be important for animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cellular respiration, be important for animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cellular respiration, be important for animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(digestion, differ in single animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(digestion, differ in single animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(digestion, differ in single animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be unsuitable for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(digestion, be necessary process for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(digestion, be necessary process for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be necessary process for animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(digestion, be unsuitable for animals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(digestion, be unsuitable for animals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(digestion, be different from human)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(digestion, differ in single animals)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(digestion, be necessary process for animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(digestion, be unsuitable for animals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different in small)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(digestion, be different from human)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(digestion, be different in small)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(digestion, be different in small)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(digestion, be different in small)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(digestion, be different from human)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(digestion, be necessary for animals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different from human)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be more complex than carbohydrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, be important for animals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be different compared to more complex animals) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cellular respiration, be important for animals)