digitalis: has quality effects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.37
Siblings aloe vera
Weight: 0.29
, valerian
Weight: 0.29
, chrysanthemum
Weight: 0.29
, horsetail
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effects 1.00
is side effects 0.91
has quality effect 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(digitalis, has quality effects)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(digitalis, is side effects)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effect)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(digitalis, is side effects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(digitalis, is side effects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(digitalis, is side effects)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(digitalis, has quality effect)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(digitalis, has quality effect)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(digitalis, has quality effect)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(digitalis, has quality effects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(digitalis, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(digitalis, has quality effects)