dim sum: be served in threes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.63
, dish
Weight: 0.62
, chinese food
Weight: 0.60
, item
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings congee
Weight: 0.39
, sum
Weight: 0.35
, dark matter
Weight: 0.34
, living thing
Weight: 0.32
, picture frame
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be served in threes 1.00
come in threes 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sum, be served in threes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sum, come in threes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sum, be served in threes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sum, come in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sum, come in threes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(dim sum, be served in threes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, come in threes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(dim sum, come in threes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(dim sum, come in threes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(dim sum, come in threes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be served in threes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(dim sum, be served in threes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sum, be served in threes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(dim sum, be served in threes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sum, come in threes)