diner: be at kitchen

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.58
, show
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.54
, film
Weight: 0.52
, event
Weight: 0.51
Siblings pizza
Weight: 0.34
, hamburger
Weight: 0.34
, fast food
Weight: 0.33
, deli
Weight: 0.33
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at kitchen 1.00
be cook on grill 0.79
be at oven 0.78
be at fast-food restaurant 0.76
has pasta dish on menu 0.76
be bake in oven 0.75
be at house 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be cook on grill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be at oven)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be at house)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be bake in oven)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(hamburger, be cook on grill)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be cook on grill)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pizza, be at oven)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pizza, be at oven)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(pizza, be at house)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(pizza, be at house)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(pizza, be bake in oven)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(pizza, be bake in oven)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(diner, be at kitchen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(diner, be at kitchen)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, has pasta dish on menu)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(hamburger, be cook on grill)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fast food, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pizza, be at oven)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(hamburger, be at fast-food restaurant)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(pizza, be bake in oven)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(diner, be at kitchen)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pizza, be at house)