dingo: eat tasmanian devils

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.49
, puppy
Weight: 0.48
, species
Weight: 0.46
, wolf
Weight: 0.46
Siblings cougar
Weight: 0.37
, coyote
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, wallaby
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat tasmanian devils 1.00
eat devils 0.98
eat humans 0.79
eat 0.76
eat babies 0.76
kangaroos foxes 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wolf, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(wolf, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(wolf, eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creature, eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(wolf, eat humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(wolf, eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(wolf, eat humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(coyote, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(wolf, eat humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(wolf, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(coyote, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(coyote, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(dingo, eat humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dingo, kangaroos foxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dingo, eat babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dingo, eat babies)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dingo, kangaroos foxes)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wolf, eat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wolf, eat humans)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coyote, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(wolf, eat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(wolf, eat humans)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(dingo, eat tasmanian devils) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)