dingo: kangaroos foxes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.49
, puppy
Weight: 0.48
, species
Weight: 0.46
, wolf
Weight: 0.46
Siblings cougar
Weight: 0.37
, coyote
Weight: 0.36
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.36
, wallaby
Weight: 0.36
, saber-toothed cat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
kangaroos foxes 1.00
be named dingoes 0.81
is feral 0.76
eat tasmanian devils 0.76
be vs coyote 0.76
is mammal 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is mammal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is mammal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(grizzly bear, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is mammal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(cougar, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cougar, is mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(dingo, kangaroos foxes)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(dingo, is mammal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(dingo, is mammal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(dingo, eat tasmanian devils)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(dingo, be vs coyote)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dingo, kangaroos foxes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cougar, is mammal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(dingo, kangaroos foxes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is mammal)