dinner: be for schmucks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for schmucks 1.00
be for schmucks rated 0.95
is crap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(gift, is crap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(gift, is crap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gift, is crap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.16
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(gift, is crap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(dinner, be for schmucks)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks rated)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks rated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dinner, be for schmucks rated)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks rated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gift, is crap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(dinner, be for schmucks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gift, is crap)