dinner: be for schmucks rated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for schmucks rated 1.00
be for schmucks 0.95
is crap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(gift, is crap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks rated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(gift, is crap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(gift, is crap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(gift, is crap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks rated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(dinner, be for schmucks rated)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(dinner, be for schmucks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks rated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(dinner, be for schmucks rated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gift, is crap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(dinner, be for schmucks rated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gift, is crap)