dinner: is zz

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents gift
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.64
, meal
Weight: 0.63
, item
Weight: 0.61
Siblings thanksgiving
Weight: 0.63
, lunch
Weight: 0.63
, reception
Weight: 0.61
, brunch
Weight: 0.57
, breakfast
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zz 1.00
is jackson ms 0.78
turn up on acww ds 0.76
is nyc 0.76
be on ah 0.76
be in cs 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinner, is zz)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(item, turn up on acww ds)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lunch, is jackson ms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(item, turn up on acww ds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(dinner, is zz)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lunch, is jackson ms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(lunch, is jackson ms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(dinner, is zz)

Similarity expansion

0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is nyc)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(dinner, is nyc)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(dinner, is nyc)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(dinner, is nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is zz)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(dinner, is zz)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, turn up on acww ds)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lunch, is jackson ms)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(dinner, is zz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(item, turn up on acww ds)